There would be few politicians in the West today who would admit publically that their politics was informed in any significant way by aesthetic experiences, let alone by 'Classical' music. Here's , one that does, and his particular interest is Mahler, no less. 

Can we, do we, take this seriously?  If so, why aren't there more like him?

My reaction to/huge enjoyment of music is part of my personality, which also affects my politics. This doesn't mean that music in general. or any particular music, is to blame for any political activity on my part - it's just part of the mix!

'Music is polity in microcosm' - Alan Lomax

It's funny how music can sometimes take on a meaning that isn't intrinsic to the work. Think of the many pop songs appropriated to political parties, or what happened with Wagner in Israel.

That seems very superficial compared to the actual reality of aesthetic awareness which that Australian politician speaks of. What a shame there aren't more like him :(

So what kind of advocacy can classical music expect from a (possible) future Tory government? There don’t seem to be many David Mellor types in the shadow cabinet. And I can’t say I’m very enthusiastic about the arts funding ideas proposed by Jeremy Hunt .

Brass players -  relax. You are not an endangered species  :)

I’ve always been intrigued by brass band finances. What keeps them afloat? Not £100,000 from the Arts Council, that’s for sure. I remember a lot of bands doing well out of the National Lottery a few years back. They all got new instruments, but they would still be playing the old ones just as enthusiastically if they hadn’t. And all the players in the top bands make a living out it, even though they are required to maintain the pretence that the entire movement operates on a voluntary basis. You’re right though, brass bands are here to stay – for better or worse. If they can survive the closure of the pits, they can survive anything.

Sorry, I just had to...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ud4qix_IYws